What’s Wrong with Africa? Is it Africans?
Hey,
Today I thought I would share with you all two great resources all revolving around answering the same question: What’s wrong with Africa? Is it Africans?
The first is a great article written by my great friend and fellow administrator of the African Dream’s Group. I have posted it below word for word. Great article by a great thinker.
The second is a discussion I had on the forums at www.mashada.com. You can find the discussion Is Africa the Problem? Or Is It Problem Africans by clicking on this link. I post under the name t.D.A. (the Displaced African). Enjoy and I hope it serves and teaches.
Be blessed; bless others,
Mwas
The Poverty of Leadership by O. Tongoi
Africa. That one word has come to be synonymous with social strife, suffering, poverty and myriads other negative connotations. Yet Africa has always been and continues to be the richest continent as far as natural resources are concerned. Why then does it continue to lag behind in terms of development? Why hasn’t it been able to jump on the bandwagon of industrialization?
Many excuses have been offered so far in an effort to explain this phenomenon and make sense of Africa’s current predicament. Many culprits have been named over the years. Among them are poverty, corruption, insufficient foreign aid among others. Yet these challenges have been overcome by other countries, societies and nations the details of which are beyond the scope of this paper. Very rarely is the underlying issue addressed however, that of poor leadership. And when it is addressed it is never done so in a conclusive manner.
“Africa has long been saddled with poor, even malevolent, leadership: predatory kleptocrats, military-installed autocrats, economic illiterates, and puffed-up posturers. By far the most egregious examples come from Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Zimbabwe — countries that have been run into the ground despite their abundant natural resources. But these cases are by no means unrepresentative: by some measures, 90 percent of sub-Saharan African nations have experienced despotic rule in the last three decades. Such leaders use power as an end in itself, rather than for the public good; they are indifferent to the progress of their citizens (although anxious to receive their adulation); they are unswayed by reason and employ poisonous social or racial ideologies; and they are hypocrites, always shifting blame for their countries’ distress.
Under the stewardship of these leaders, infrastructure in many African countries has fallen into disrepair, currencies have depreciated, and real prices have inflated dramatically, while job availability, health care, education standards, and life expectancy have declined. Ordinary life has become beleaguered: general security has deteriorated, crime and corruption have increased, much-needed public funds have flowed into hidden bank accounts, and officially sanctioned ethnic discrimination — sometimes resulting in civil war — has become prevalent.” Robert I. Rotberg could not have put it better. In his article titled “Strengthening African Leadership”, published in the July/August issue of Foreign Affairs, Rotberg summed up the single most important issue facing Africa; Leadership…or lack thereof.
This failure of leadership is by no means a recent predicament. It dates back several centuries ago to the time of the slave trade. It is a known fact that the Arabs who facilitated the trade did not acquire the slaves through force or conquest of any kind, rather, they approached the leaders of the communities with beads, cowrie shells and mirrors and offered these in exchange for human beings whom they would later sell as slaves.
Paul E. Lovejoy wrote the following in his article, “Transformations in slavery” published by the Cambridge University Press: “Between 1450 and the end of the nineteenth century, slaves were obtained from along the west coast of Africa with the full and active co-operation of African kings and merchants. (There were occasional military campaigns organized by Europeans to capture slaves, especially by the Portuguese in what is now Angola, but this accounts for only a small percentage of the total.) In return, the African kings and merchants received various trade goods including beads, cowrie shells (used as money), textiles, brandy, horses, and perhaps most importantly, guns. The guns were used to help expand empires and obtain more slaves…”
I had earlier stated that the Arabs did not acquire the slaves through conquest of any kind. Allow me to retract that statement because they in fact pulled off a great coup by obtaining slaves in exchange for mere objects, and that is in itself a great conquest. Sadly, this conquest continues even to this day; African leaders continue to sell their people into slavery.
The slavery of which I now speak, however is not the traditional form of slavery in which people are held in physical captivity and made to work for others, rather I speak of an economic form of slavery in which people are bound by debt and kept in servitude by the chains of high interest rates.
Sample the following article by Susan George titled “A Fate Worse than Debt” published in the January 2006 issue of the NewAfrican magazine. She writes, “Debt is not a financial problem. It is a political problem. If you cancelled all the debt of the poorest countries tomorrow, the international financial system would not even notice. However, debt is extraordinarily useful for the [lenders]; it is much better than colonialism as you don’t need the people. But you get tremendous political advantage because you have continuous low prices for raw materials, everyone is forced to export at the same time, and you have political control over the government because of structural adjustment.” This article by George sums up the predicament Africa is in-economic slavery.
But who is to blame? For many years Africans have directed their blame to external parties especially Western powers while in fact the blame lies upon our leaders themselves. It would only make sense for the leaders of the lending countries to seek to improve their economic strength and the financial position of their corporations by creating markets for them. What doesn’t make sense, however, is why the leaders of the borrowing countries would agree to such terms and continue to dig their people deeper into debt.
One of the things that saddens African intellectuals most is the fact that about 40 years ago, at the time when most African countries were gaining independence, they were at par with most Asian countries in terms of economic and social development. However, since then the Asian countries which have come to be known as the ‘East Asian Tigers’, have realized tremendous growth and industrialization and have propelled themselves into the elite class of first-world countries. One can be quick to conclude that their planning was superior. The truth is quite the contrary; the master plans used by the East Asian Tigers borrowed heavily from those developed by the Kenyan government of the time. Why then is Africa lagging behind? Perhaps this excerpt from a speech by Nigerian president Olesegun Obasanjo can help shed light on the matter: “…In 1960, whatever parameters you look at, whether social or economic indicators, Africa has declined compared to the rest of the world, particularly when measured against those parts of the world that were comparable to us at that time such as Asia and Latin America,” he said. “Why are we failing while the rest of the world is succeeding, yet Africa [is not any less endowed compared to other parts of the world?] I believe one word answers that question: Leadership,” he said.
Later on in the speech he went on to give his solution to the challenge. He mentioned that “…it lies in doing things right, and in having the right leadership. The difference between doing things right and doing things wrong is enormous…Africa cannot continue on the same negative road (of having poor leadership) and expect things to work for the better.
One might ask the question, “How and when did this failure of leadership start?”
In my opinion, it all started in the colonial era when the Europeans empowered a few Africans and gave them some sort of education with a view to using them to govern their own people. As a result, a culture in which leadership was imposed on the people began. In this new culture, leaders governed using the divide and rule principle. They oppressed the people placed under them rather than empowering them. They had their own interests at heart and ensured that they kept their fellow Africans oppressed because that way they would remain relevant to the European colonialists and ensure that no other Africans could rise and take their positions.
The greatest tragedy was when Africans came to not only tolerate but accept such leadership, much in the same way as a terminal patient accepts their illness-without a fight and with a sense of defeat and helplessness. I must, however at this point mention the ‘Maumau’ freedom fighters as an exception because failure to do so would be a great injustice to them for the sacrifice they made in their efforts to repel the colonialists. Other than for the exertions of those few brave and fearless souls, the general norm of behavior was inaction.
Returning to my argument, allow me to fast-forward to the first few years of the post-independence era. This was indeed a decisive period in the formation of the continent’s political future. On the one hand we had excellent leaders such as Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah and Tom Mboya of Kenya who were totally committed to the greater good of their people. By a sad twist of fate these great men were assassinated either by foreign powers that were against their ideologies or by their compatriots who considered them a threat to their own power.( At this point another great tragedy occurred, for no one rushed to the frontline to take up the fallen heroes’ battle cries, condemning the African dream to the graveyard.) On the other hand, however, there emerged a different breed of leaders. These considered themselves as heroes and rewarded themselves with large tracts of land and other public resources and set off along the path of self-aggrandizement while ignoring the greater good of their people. These sought to create economic empires and political dynasties by surrounding themselves with their tribesmen and appointing sycophants into political office regardless of their level of qualification or lack thereof. Unfortunately, the latter breed of leaders comprised the majority, thrusting Africa backward and in most cases erasing the gains of the newly-acquired independence of the African states they led.
Another category of early African powerbrokers is curiously missing from the aforementioned list. It is not without intention that I left military dictators out of this equation. These cannot be categorized as leaders but rather as tyrants. For this reason and for the purpose of focusing on the main points of my argument, allow me to exclude them from my argument altogether.
Two score years after the first generation of leaders had taken the reins of government from the Europeans, a new generation of leaders had taken over and these too seemed intent on carrying on the legacy of their predecessors. They continued to widen the rift between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots’ as a new political and social class system developed.
While I have noted that the first generation had taken over from the Europeans, the next generation was mainly composed of the preferred successors of the first generation. As such they had been groomed to take over and, reminiscent of the colonial eras, they were proposed if not outrightly imposed upon the people.
At this point yet another tragedy occurred; it took the form of the emergence of a new political system based on personalities rather than on issues. The stage was set for the elevation of certain people-mainly sycophants-into “great” political personalities despite their lack of character and/ or competence. Politics became a mere game of words and wordplay. Semantics blurred the underlying issues. Promises were broken almost as soon as they were made, if not sooner. A mockery was made of the justice system and some people turned out to be more equal than others. The mess continues until today.
It would indeed be a sad state of affairs and the greatest of tragedies if we concluded that Africa is beyond help; that it is too late to recover from its past. There is indeed hope for Africa-hope that is vested in a new breed of leaders. You may at this juncture be inclined to think that I am in the advanced stages of plotting a coup attempt; and if you are so inclined then you would be right to some extent.
The leadership which I envisage, however, is far from the traditional quest for coercive power and control of common resources that is as common today as it was in the past. I envisage a form of leadership based solely on unselfish ambition; as opposed to the familiar form of leadership where leaders strive to merge their own selfish ambitions with the common good of the people and attempt to strike a sort of balance between the two. I speak of a leadership style founded in the greater good of those it hopes to serve, such that the leader would spare no effort nor avoid no sacrifice which would result in the greater fortunes of those that it serves. A leadership so deeply rooted in the principles which give it its mandate, that no entity can question its sincerity. Indeed, such leadership has been sought after and striven towards by many whose efforts, sadly, came to naught. The reason? I cannot claim to posses the depth of insight required to provide the answer to such a question but allow me this modest attempt…
The reason why this style of leadership and the success it promises has eluded Africans is based on a number of factors influenced mainly by our perception of leadership. From our up-bringing, lessons on leadership have been focused on the wrong attributes of a leader, concentrating more on what the leader is rather than on who the leader is. We look at the leader’s public lifestyle rather than seeking to know what the leader does when he is out of the lime-light. We place a lot of emphasis on the major decisions made by the leader while failing to see the minor decisions that the leader makes, or rather, ignoring those minor decisions and passing them off as irrelevant. This pattern of selective attention may be attributed to our fascination with the romance of the larger-than-life image created by the media and the fuss over major news-breaking events, oblivious to the fact that today’s news began falling into place yesterday, with the daily, routine and apparently ‘un-newsworthy’ actions and choices that were made in obscurity.
Africans tend to look externally for leaders rather than looking internally and taking initiative to lead in ways which are open to all of us. We have become so accustomed to passing the blame that we fail to see our own failure to make a difference. We each must strive to invest in our own capacity as positive influencers of those around us. We should not only search for virtue in others but must also vow to uphold it in ourselves. Africa is in dire need of people who can lead themselves. Africans have indeed been plagued by poor leadership. But in the end, we cannot blame the leaders who hold certain titles or positions in society. The buck stops with every individual African who is looking to blame external sources for their current situation. Personal leadership and accountability is the key to Africa’s woes.
You dig?
13 Comments
Other Links to this Post
-
Is Africa the Problem? or the Problem Africans? - Page 6 - Mashada Forums — January 29, 2008 @ 4:09 pm
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
By justin, January 29, 2008 @ 12:21 am
great blog!! found it quite interesting tho i feel ur missing mother africa’s loving arms.maybe u should come into her loving embrace.
By Mwangi, January 29, 2008 @ 12:27 am
Soon and very soon I shall return and nestle myself warmly in the womb of Mama Africa. But sadly there is much preparation and learning to be done in the West.
Thanks for the feedback and the comment bruh. Have a great day
By Phil, February 7, 2008 @ 8:28 pm
Finding your site was an accident thanks to google, but I like it
By Intelligent Race, January 8, 2009 @ 10:02 am
You bleeding hearts that can’t admit that the african (black race) of people are INFERIOR…until you get it, you will destroy the future of the next generations; becasue for some stupid reason, the bleeding hearts foster the rampant birth rate of the Inferior genetic black/african people. For Example…Name one large population (1,000 or more blacks) that live in a group that can succeed on it’s own without the help of White people. This is a FACT you idiot bleeding hearts cannot deny. I understand that individual black people can be very successful and even have a high intelligence. But the FACTs of the matter are: blacks are INFERIOR, and there is not a single successful group (1,000 or more) located in the World, not even in the United States or Europe, not in the Middle East, Asia…NO-Where!!!! Get it through your stupid thick skulls bleeding hearted idiots…it is not their leadership, it is the Fact that blacks as they live in a group cannot succeed because of their Inferior genetics…!!!!
By Mwangi, January 8, 2009 @ 5:09 pm
@Intelligent: I am sure you are a nice guy but even you’ve got to know that what you’ve just written above is absolute drivel that ignores history the current socio-economic make up of the world….heck I think you probably came up with an idea like that sitting in your house in your underwear.
I knew you had really railed off the deep end when you included Asians – you know the folks who have had civilizations and empires since time immemorial and the Middle East – you know one of the birth places of a lot of modern philosophy and medicine.
Seriously man I know you want to get angry about something; choose wisely, you’re out of your element on this one.
Have a great 2009.
By White African, February 15, 2009 @ 7:58 am
I’m afraid I don’t see much hope for Africa either. I’m really sorry. No invention, no forward vision, no sense of sustainability, no thought of future generations, no conservation of nature and wildlife, no respect for law and order. Just slaughtering one another and having children by the dozens.
No logic. No rational thinking. A mother having so many children in those conditions is no mother. Africa will be colonized again I think, it’s a place with a perfect climate and much beauty. It’s sad, but it’s true.
Not to mention the dictatorial “leaders” who are quick to give the West a tongue lashing, all the while enjoying the perks the West has to offer; cars, telecommunication, infrastructure, plains, trains, clothing, cameras, all technology, medicine, the weapons etc. etc.
Africa is doomed. Not the continent, it’s too beautiful and rich, but the people. They’re doomed. They can’t farm, yet they have fertile soil and a perfect climate. This continent breaks my heart, but facts are facts. When Neanderthal came in contact with Cro-Magnon, the meeting was fatal for Neanderthal. The same will happen to Africans. The future will favour the more intelligent.
The sun is setting on Africa. Africa is dying, but after a death, there’s a new birth. I’m sure you’ll give me the third degree after my post, that’s okay. I’m too damn tired of having any hope for this godforsaken continent. Facts don’t depend on how many people believe them, they remain facts. When everybody believed the Earth was flat, it remained round.
By Mwangi, February 15, 2009 @ 9:41 am
@White African: Today I finally got around to watching “Gangs of New York”. If a global powerhouse like NY can develop out of THAT, I think if history is a good predictor of the future, we’ll be fine……
By White African, April 12, 2009 @ 8:34 am
Actually, we are better of than the Americans, but that’s another story for another day
Free is the man who has nothing to lose.
By Mwangi, April 13, 2009 @ 6:59 am
@White African: Please make this another day and tell me why.
True dat true dat true dat.
By White African, April 13, 2009 @ 7:26 pm
Of course I can’t generalize about Africa, it’s a gigantic place with lots of cultures, climates etc.
http://www.petersmap.com/
The above link shows how big Africa really is, but certain powers would rather keep that info concealed. Read through the above website.
I can only speak as a South African. My comment didn’t apply to Congo, Zim and a few other unfortunate African countries.
There has always been s systematic campaign in the West to only show Africa’s heartache; disease, famine, distators, civil wars. No good news is ever covered. I mean, the last thing they need right now is for the Americans to think they have the short end of the stick here. Instead, they are being brainwashed by their media to think that they are the only free nation on earth, and they are somehow superior to others. But contact with Americans quickly shows that something is very wrong with their education.
They are being dumped down by their education system. The average American on the street have the general knowledge of a chicken.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww&feature=related
This isn’t their fault, it’s done by design. For Americans, America IS the world.
They have become a big brother police state after 911, with embarrasing searches when they board planes (removing shoes and belts) and CCTV cameras everywhere. They are taxed for practically everything.
Their consumer culture (eat, eat, eat and watch tv and play computer games all day long) have made them an unhealthy and obese nation. A healthy body houses a healthy spirit.
They are being used as a puppet by Isreal, with Israel lobbyists controling their whole government for Zionistic agenda and expansion. Their tax dollars are used for imperialstic aggression all over the world, instead of bettering their own conditions like healthcare and education.
All their mainstream media networks are Zionist owned. They tell the American people what they think the American people should know.
Their big pharmaceuticals certainly don’t have the people’s best interest at heart, being caught out time and again for sickening the nation. They have one of the worst healthcare systems in the world. A culture of dependancy on anti-depressants is promoted.
Back to Africa, we are free. Our good news is never covered by the West, and it far outnumbers the bad news. It’s the most beautiful place on earth. We are free under the glorious African sun. There will always be challenges, but it’s time we are depicted in the right light for a change by the world media. Or maybe it’s best that we’re not, otherwise everyone would want to come here
By White African, April 13, 2009 @ 9:09 pm
http://www.sagoodnews.co.za/
And there are websites like this one for many African countries, in an attempt to balance the news and restore investor confidence. In fact, it’s better not to watch the news at all these days, because they only cover awful stories with the intent of fear mongering. Motto of the news business: “If it bleeds, it leads”. You have to seek out trustworthy sources who report the news with balance.
And you won’t find them in mainstream media
Objective reporting is a foreign concept for the mainstream media. And the damage being done is colossal. The global collective human psyche is very affected by this. It’s clearly observable.
That’s why Africans always seem so happy, because access to Western propaganda is so limited.
A good thing, for sure 
It took me a long time to realize how fortunate we are. I’m not wearing blinkers either, there is much suffering in Africa. But the positive human spirit and collective psyche is very tangible. We are rich with something money can’t buy.
By Olulove, January 17, 2010 @ 12:09 am
Mwangi,That was very good piece on Africa and the way forward.Good to know that their are still compatriots out there who believe in the future of Africa.
There are few shining lights in Africa.
Ghana is one of them. They have established a democracy that works and a judicial system that is feared and respected.
Mozambique is yet another star. They have a evolve a corp of good leaders that have raised the minimum entry criteria to qualify as a leader.
South Africa is yet another shining light. South Africa is currently the most industialized country in Africa. They are not doing badly on the leadership scale.
Nigeria is even yet another.Since the last three democratic dispensations, we have witness a better and better quality of people in our echelons of leadership. Some of these people are individuals who have distinguished themselves in the diaspora. Others are those who have done well at home. Some of these people include; Ngozi Okonjo-Nweala, Charles Soludo,Dora Akunyili,Nuhu Ribadu. The dispensation of these people brought great honor to the polity they gave us a panoramic view of what can be when their is good leadership, they sey good records that have raised the minimum entry criteria to qualify as a leader. That is why in subsequent democratic dispensation (the current) we saw a lot of distinguished bureacrats and technocrat coming out to be counted. The current Governor of Lagos state is a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (the highest honor that can be conferred on a lawyer in Nigeria). No wander Lagos state has already distinquished itself in all key perfoirmance indicators.
What am I saying? There are a few countries in African that are undergoing a slow but sure metamorphosis.
I used the word metamorphosis delibrately. The butterfly is not born a butterfly.It is first of all, an egg,then a caterpillar(margot), then a Pupa and finally the butterfly emerges.
Some African countries are breaking away from the conditions that have kept them as caterpillars for a long time. Some are at the tail end of their Pupa stage and are at the verge of breaking out into butterflies.
It won’t be long before the the few nations who stand as shining light in Africa, begin to influence the nations around them. Much like the success of one Asian Tiger nation flowed to others.
A brighter day for Africa is just around the corner.
keep your torch burning.